STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- KRISTINA N. GAGOVSKI, Defendant-Appellant
Case No. 12AP020012
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
2012-Ohio-6088; 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 5260
December 19, 2012, Date of Judgment Entry
COUNSEL:
For Appellant: RODNEY A. BACA, Canton, OH.
For Appellee: RYAN STYER, TUSCARAWAS CO. PROSECUTOR, R. SCOTT DIETRICK, New Philadelphia, OH.
JUDGES:
Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J., Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J., Hon. John W. Wise, J. Farmer, J. and Wise, J. concur.
OPINION BY: Patricia A. Delaney
Appellant Kristina N. Gagovski appeals her conviction and sentence in the Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas upon one count of felonious assault. Appellee is the state of Ohio.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellant and Jason Bair were once romantically involved and have two daughters together, ages 2 and 4 at the time of these events. Appellant and Bair had lived together in an apartment on 4th Drive, New Philadelphia, Ohio. Bair eventually moved out of the apartment but visited frequently because of the children. After Bair moved out, a roommate, Molly Miller, moved in with appellant and her children.
On July 4, 2011, Bair had both children with him at his mother’s house during the day. Friends came over for a party and Bair had approximately five beers during the course of the day. He spoke to appellant on the telephone several times and the conversations were cordial. In the meantime, appellant was also at a party with friends of her own. Appellant consumed a bottle of wine and three or four shots, topped off with Xanax and Vicodin, among other prescription medications.
Around 5:00 p.m., Bair and the two children returned to the house on 4th Drive in Bair’s van to meet appellant. Appellant got into the van and the four drove to a Mini Market where they bought alcoholic beverages. They returned to the house, put the beverages away, and then left again for Taco Bell to purchase food. Bair drove.
Upon their return to the house, appellant sat on the couch in the living room and ate with the 2-year-old while Bair was in the kitchen with the 4-year-old. As the four ate downstairs, Molly Miller returned to the residence and went upstairs.
In the kitchen, Bair looked at appellant’s cell phone and noticed a text message which angered him. Bair told appellant he was leaving immediately, accused her of cheating on him, and called up the stairs to Miller that he was leaving. Bair took the 4-year-old with him to the minivan and began to strap her into her car seat.
Appellant came out of the house with a steak knife in her hand and told Bair, “You’re not leaving.” She punctured a tire on the van with the knife, flattening it. She then opened the van’s rear door and pulled the 4-year-old out of the vehicle. Bair said he was going to call the police regarding appellant’s treatment of the child. According to Bair, appellant then stated, “You’re dead” and stabbed him in his upper left chest.
Bair told appellant to call 911 but she refused, stating she would lose the kids if the police were involved. Bair then yelled for Miller, who was still upstairs. Miller grabbed both children and ran to a neighbor’s house to call police. Appellant told Bair she was sorry and that she loved him.
Bair was transported to Akron General Hospital where he was found to have a 2-centimeter left anterior chest laceration. Upon review of an x-ray, treating doctors determined his wound was superficial because it did not threaten his lungs or heart. The wound was dressed and Bair was told to keep clean gauze on it.
Appellant’s Shifting Admissions to the Stabbing
During the investigation of the stabbing, appellant gave investigators a written statement claiming Bair came after her and she stabbed him to defend herself.
At trial, appellant testified on her own behalf and admitted she stabbed Bair but claimed it was an accident. She claimed she punctured the tire of the van in an attempt to stop Bair from driving drunk with the kids, and that Bair chased her back into the house as she carried the knife and then somehow “fell” onto the knife.
Appellant Urged Witness Not to Seek Help for Bair
Miller also testified at trial. She did not hear the confrontation which led to the stabbing and was still upstairs when she heard Bair calling “Molly, help me.” She found him laying on the floor of the garage, obviously injured, with appellant standing over him. The couple’s 4-year-old daughter was “draped over” Bair, sobbing. Appellant said Bair was fine, but Miller picked up the telephone to call police. The phone did not work. Appellant’s shirt was off and she wore only a bra; Miller noticed appellant’s cell phone tucked into the bra. Miller asked to use the cell phone to call police but appellant refused. Miller then grabbed the children and ran to the neighbor’s house to use their phone.
Indictment, Conviction, and Sentence
Appellant was charged by indictment with two counts of felonious assault pursuant to R.C. 2903.11(A)(1) and (A)(2), but appellee dismissed the first count prior to trial. The case proceeded to trial by jury. Appellant moved for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Crim.R. 29(A) at the conclusion of appellee’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence; the motions were overruled. Appellant was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to a prison term of two years, suspended upon the condition that she complete a community control sanction.
Appellant now appeals from the judgment entries of her conviction and sentence.
Appellant raises two Assignments of Error:
“I. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION AND DENIED APPELLANT HER DUE PROCESS RIGHTS TO A FAIR TRIAL BY NOT ALLOWING EVIDENCE OF THE VICTIM’S CHARACTER REGARDING OPINION AND REPUTATION, AND SPECIFIC ACTS EVIDENCED.”
“II. THE EVIDENCE IS INSUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN THE CONVICTION AND THE VERDICT IS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE.”
I.
Appellant argues in her first assignment of error the trial court should have permitted her to elicit evidence of Bair’s alleged specific violent acts, to wit, a number of alleged acts of domestic violence against appellant.
The admission or exclusion of evidence is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court. Absent an abuse of discretion resulting in material prejudice to the defendant, a reviewing court should be reluctant to interfere with a trial court’s decision in this regard. State v. Hymore, 9 Ohio St.2d 122, 128, 224 N.E.2d 126 (1967). In order to find an abuse of discretion, the reviewing court must find that the trial court’s decision was unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable and not merely an error of law or judgment. Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 5 Ohio B. 481, 450 N.E.2d 1140 (1983).
A victim’s violent acts may become relevant and admissible only under certain limited circumstances. “Evidence of a person’s character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, although evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same, or evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor is admissible.” Evid.R. 404. In all cases in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. On cross-examination, inquiry is allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct. Evid.R. 405(A). In cases in which character or a trait of character of a person is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense, proof may also be made of specific instances of his conduct. Evid.R. 405(B).
Appellant argued evidence of Bair’s past violent acts was relevant to her claim of self-defense, but prior to trial, appellee filed a motion in limine to exclude any such evidence. The trial court sustained appellee’s motion on the basis of State v. Barnes, in which the Ohio Supreme Court ruled specific instances of a victim’s conduct are not admissible to prove the victim was the initial aggressor. 94 Ohio St.3d 21, 23, 2002 Ohio 68, 759 N.E.2d 1240. Near the end of trial, outside the presence of the jury, appellant proffered the evidence she would have introduced if the motion in limine had not been sustained; defense counsel said Molly Miller would have testified Bair “is a violent, angry man and that he has been violent toward [appellant.]” Appellant then listed a number of alleged specific acts of threats and domestic violence perpetrated against her by Bair. We note it is unclear from the record how appellant would have introduced these specific acts, whether through testimony of Miller or appellant herself. Either way, we find the proffered specific-act evidence is exactly the type prohibited by Barnes, supra, and the trial court did not err in excluding it.
Appellant argues further she should have been permitted to introduce evidence of Bair’s propensity for violence by means of reputation or opinion testimony. We note, though, appellant did in fact testify Bair had beaten her up in the past, that she was “scared to death” of him, and that she “had a lot of fear” based upon things he had done to her in the past. The trial court permitted appellant latitude in addressing Bair’s alleged violent past despite the ruling on appellee’s motion in limine.
Appellant’s assigned error, then, turns upon whether appellant should have been permitted to ask Molly Miller about Bair’s reputation for violence or her opinion thereof. We find any error by the trial court in excluding this narrow piece of evidence was harmless. Bair’s alleged violent nature did come into evidence via appellant’s testimony. Moreover, appellant’s argument at trial focused more upon the stabbing as an accident rather than self-defense, as will be discussed with regard to appellant’s second assignment of error, infra. Harmless errors are to be disregarded and the erroneous admission or exclusion of evidence is not reversible unless it affects a substantial right that prejudices the defendant. See, Crim.R. 52(A); Evid.R. 103(A); State v. Brown, 65 Ohio St.3d 483, 485, 1992 Ohio 61, 605 N.E.2d 46 (1992).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting appellee’s motion in limine and appellant’s first assignment of error is overruled.
II.
In the second assignment of error, appellant argues her conviction upon one count of felonious assault is against the manifest weight and sufficiency of the evidence because the victim’s wound was superficial. We disagree.
The legal concepts of sufficiency of the evidence and weight of the evidence are both quantitatively and qualitatively different. State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 1997 Ohio 52, 678 N.E.2d 541, paragraph two of the syllabus. The standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is set forth in State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 574 N.E.2d 492 (1991) at paragraph two of the syllabus, in which the Ohio Supreme Court held, “An appellate court’s function when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is to examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
In determining whether a conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence, the court of appeals functions as the “thirteenth juror,” and after “reviewing the entire record, weighs the evidence and all reasonable inferences, considers the credibility of witnesses and determines whether in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the jury clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be overturned and a new trial ordered.” State v. Thompkins, supra, 78 Ohio St.3d at 387. Reversing a conviction as being against the manifest weight of the evidence and ordering a new trial should be reserved for only the “exceptional case in which the evidence weighs heavily against the conviction.” Id.
Appellant was convicted of one count of felonious assault pursuant to R.C. 2903.11(A)(2), which states, “No person shall knowingly cause or attempt to cause physical harm to another by means of a deadly weapon.” The evidence at trial established appellant stabbed Bair with a steak knife in his left upper chest, by her own admission. During the investigation appellant claimed the stabbing was in self-defense, although at trial she inferred it was the result of an accident. Upon appeal, she argues her conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence and is not supported by sufficient evidence because appellee did not establish the element of “knowingly.”
Appellant’s argument is based upon evidence that Bair’s wound was superficial and she and Bair both testified the stabbing was not “intentional.” A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist. R.C. 2901.22(B).
We are required to review the evidence in a light most favorable to appellee, and in so doing we find ample evidence appellant admittedly stabbed Bair intentionally. The circumstances leading up to the stabbing indicate appellant argued with Bair and used the knife to puncture a tire on his vehicle to prevent him from leaving. When the argument continued and escalated to the point that Bair threatened to call police, appellant stabbed him. These events are not consistent with appellant’s initial assertion of self-defense. To establish self-defense in the use of non-deadly force, the accused must show, initially, she was not at fault in creating the situation giving rise to the altercation. State v. Hoopingarner, 5th Dist. No. 2010AP 07 00022, 2010 Ohio 6490, ∂ 31, citing State v. Vance, Ashland App. No. 2007-COA-035, 2008 Ohio 4763, ∂ 77 (citations omitted). If this element, e.g., is not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, the theory of self-defense does not apply. State v. Williford, 49 Ohio St.3d 247, 249, 551 N.E.2d 1279 (1990). Appellant initiated the violent altercation and confronted Bair, knife in hand.
Appellant’s belated claim of accident is also inconsistent with her reaction in the immediate aftermath of the incident: she refused to get help for Bair despite what appeared to be a significant wound. Not only did she refuse to personally help him, but she encouraged Miller not to seek help and refused to allow her to use her cell phone.
In conclusion, appellant’s conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and appellant’s second assignment of error is overruled.
For the foregoing reasons, the Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
By: Delaney, P.J.
Farmer, J. and
Wise, J. concur.
HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
HON. JOHN W. WISE
JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Opinion on file, the judgment of the Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Costs assessed to Appellant.
HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
HON. JOHN W. WISE
Pingback: Homepage
Pingback: YOURURL.com
Pingback: buy driver license online
Pingback: Cornhole
Pingback: นิยายจีน pdf
Pingback: nam mo thay giet nguoi
Pingback: buying dumps online
Pingback: Skrota bilen gratis
Pingback: mơ thấy nhà đánh con gì
Pingback: mo thay toc
Pingback: mơ thấy em trai đánh con gì
Pingback: briansclub dumps
Pingback: weed reviews youtube
Pingback: cvv dump sites
Pingback: 웹툰미리보기
Pingback: DevOps
Pingback: what is a cvv
Pingback: how do i fix too many redirects on chrome
Pingback: mơ thấy đi chợ
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy phật bà quan âm
Pingback: mơ thấy giày dép đánh con gì
Pingback: mơ thấy nhẫn vàng đánh con gì
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy mình thắp hương
Pingback: safe cod warzone hacks
Pingback: mơ thấy chìa khóa
Pingback: mơ thấy chim bồ câu đánh con gì
Pingback: mơ cãi nhau đánh con gì
Pingback: mơ thấy con sâu
Pingback: mơ thấy thầy bói
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy hoa sen
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy ngựa đánh số gì
Pingback: mơ cá sấu đánh con gì
Pingback: daftar arahqq
Pingback: fakerolex.ru
Pingback: mơ thấy sếp cũ
Pingback: mơ thấy bếp lửa cháy
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy bướm
Pingback: mơ thấy con trâu đánh đề con gì
Pingback: mơ thấy cầu vồng
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy ốc đánh con gì
Pingback: casino
Pingback: 마나모아
Pingback: 토토사이트
Pingback: linzhi phoenixminer
Pingback: http://95.111.232.179/
Pingback: mortgage
Pingback: market report
Pingback: roomlearning.com
Pingback: blue velvet dress
Pingback: ตู้แปลภาษา
Pingback: buy canadian
Pingback: ivermectin 3mg dose
Pingback: Anonymous
Pingback: Anonymous
Pingback: ivermectin
Pingback: how much does ivermectin cost
Pingback: stromectol for sale
Pingback: ignition casino sign up
Pingback: order ivermectin
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: order generic prednisone 20mg
Pingback: india pharmacy tadalafil
Pingback: elexusbet
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: tadalafil price walmart
Pingback: ivermectin 200mg
Pingback: order stromectol
Pingback: order viagra tesco
Pingback: tadalafil prix
Pingback: who makes viagra
Pingback: buy ivermectin for humans australia
Pingback: goodrx tadalafil
Pingback: best online cialis
Pingback: medshuku best place to buy cialis online
Pingback: purchase sildenafil pills
Pingback: goodrx tadalafil
Pingback: baymavi
Pingback: baymavi
Pingback: tadalafil and dapoxetine
Pingback: ivermectin in canada for humans
Pingback: real sildenafil pills online
Pingback: real sildenafil pills online
Pingback: tadalafil otc
Pingback: can you buy cialis without a prescription
Pingback: how to buy cialis in india
Pingback: tombala siteleri
Pingback: buy prednisone for pets
Pingback: prednisone 20mg used for
Pingback: merck pill for covid 19
Pingback: tadalafil femme
Pingback: cialis black
Pingback: cialis com
Pingback: purchase oral ivermectin
Pingback: prednisone
Pingback: buy viagra online india
Pingback: cialis pills
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: $200 no deposit casino codes
Pingback: cialis walmart
Pingback: ivermectin trial
Pingback: stromectol how much it cost
Pingback: biggest no deposit welcome bonus
Pingback: buy ivermectin fitness
Pingback: cialis kopen
Pingback: what is cialis
Pingback: viagra sans ordonnance au quebec
Pingback: buy tadalafil online
Pingback: ivermectin generic
Pingback: purchase stromectol
Pingback: ivermectin for worms in humans
Pingback: generic
Pingback: stromectol 6 mg tablet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: trcasino
Pingback: generic sildenafil tablets
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: bahis siteleri
Pingback: 2addicted
Pingback: A片
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: türk porno seks
Pingback: sikiş
Pingback: fuck google
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: porn
Pingback: meritking giriş
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: meritking giriş
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: Grandpashabet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: izmir escort
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: fuck porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: xxlargeseodigi
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: sex
Pingback: çeşme transfer
Pingback: izmir travesti
Pingback: fethiye escort
Pingback: porno izleme sitesi
Pingback: hd porno izle
Pingback: istanbul travesti
Pingback: porn
Pingback: sikiş
Pingback: yasam ayavefe
Pingback: Bu website sitemap ile güçlendirilmiştir
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: cratosroyalbet
Pingback: bu site sitemap tarafından güncellenmiştir
Pingback: travesti.site
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: kralbet twitter
Pingback: vassycalvados.fr
Pingback: lugabet giriş
Pingback: betgross giriş
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: jojobet
Pingback: jojobet twitter
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: anal porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: spinco
Pingback: iyibilirdik
Pingback: samsung taşınabilir ssd
Pingback: mars bahis
Pingback: betine giris
Pingback: denizli masaj salonu
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: bmw
Pingback: kadinlar
Pingback: sex historie
Pingback: bugatti tumblr
Pingback: ankara travesti
Pingback: edebiyat tumblr
Pingback: ankaratravesti.xyz
Pingback: sex
Pingback: https://bursatravesti.online/
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: ankara travesti ilanları
Pingback: sultangazi rent a car
Pingback: sex
Pingback: istanbul dental teknik servis
Pingback: gebze epoksi zemin kaplama
Pingback: rize tumblr
Pingback: sex
Pingback: gece tumblr
Pingback: sakakrizi tumblr
Pingback: prague tantra massage
Pingback: prague erotic massage
Pingback: alintilarım tumblr
Pingback: inovapin.com
Pingback: gaziantep saat tamiri
Pingback: kütahya günlük apart daire
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: takipçi satın al tumblr
Pingback: kütahya günlük apart
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: ankara psikolog
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: geciktirici kremler
Pingback: yapay kızlık zarı
Pingback: child porn watch
Pingback: hardcore porn
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: meritking giriş
Pingback: meritking gir
Pingback: meritking news
Pingback: çorlu klima servisi
Pingback: meritking şikayetvar
Pingback: silivri avukat
Pingback: hd porn
Pingback: karşıyaka psikolog
Pingback: hp servis izmir
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn kingroyal
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: tr güncel içerik listesi
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: porn
Pingback: en iyi bayan azdırıcı hangisi
Pingback: canlı maç izle
Pingback: kayseri taksi
Pingback: pusulabet
Pingback: misty casino