Case Laws

State v. Wolf, 260 Ore. App. 414 (OR Ct. App. 2013) Court of Appeals of Oregon October 16, 2013, Argued and Submitted; December 26, 2013, Filed A150380 260 Ore. App. 414 | 317 P.3d 377 | 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 1517 | 2013 WL 6834955 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAVID AUBREY WOLF, Defendant-Appellant. Counsel: […]

Grimes v. McAnulty, 957 S.W.2d 223 (KY Supreme Court) Supreme Court of Kentucky October 2, 1997, Rendered 95-SC-745-MR 957 S.W.2d 223, 1997 Ky. LEXIS 118 CHRISTINA M. GRIMES, APPELLANT v. WILLIAM E. McANULTY, Judge, Jefferson Circuit Court, APPELLEE AND COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST Counsel: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Richard Heideman, The Heidman Law

Estep v. Commonwealth, 64 S.W.3d 805 (TN Supreme Court 2002) Supreme Court of Kentucky January 17, 2002, Rendered 1999-SC-0814-DG 64 S.W.3d 805 | 2002 Ky. LEXIS 5 RALEIGH ESTEP, APPELLANT v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, APPELLEE Counsel: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Mark Wettle, Louisville, KY. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: A. B. Chandler, III, Attorney General, State Capitol, Frankfort,

State v. Slimick, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1016 (TN Ct. App. 2015) Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville June 9, 2015, Session; December 17, 2015, Filed No. M2014-00747-CCA-R3-CD 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TANYA NICOLE SLIMICK Counsel: David L. Raybin, Nashville, Tennessee (at trial and on appeal),

State v. Wenger, 593 N.W.2d 467 (WI Ct. App. 1998) Court of Appeals of Wisconsin December 14, 1998, Submitted on Briefs ; January 12, 1999, Decided ; January 12, 1999, Opinion Filed No. 98-1739-CR 225 Wis. 2d 495; 593 N.W.2d 467; 1999 Wisc. App. LEXIS 15 State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LaVere D. Wenger, Defendant-Appellant.

State v. Syed Tagi Shah, 397 N.W.2d 492 (WI Supreme Court 1986) Supreme Court of Wisconsin November 25, 1986, Argued ; December 22, 1986, Decided No. 85-1028-CR 134 Wis. 2d 246; 397 N.W.2d 492; 1986 Wisc. LEXIS 2072 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Syed Tagi SHAH, Defendant- Counsel: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner there were briefs by

State v. Nollie, 638 N.W.2d 280 (WI Supreme Court 2001) Supreme Court of Wisconsin October 4, 2001, Oral Argument ; January 23, 2002, Opinion Filed No. 00-0744-CR 249 Wis. 2d 538; 638 N.W.2d 280; 2002 Wisc. LEXIS 3; 2002 WI 4 Counsel: For the defendant-appellant there were briefs by Erich C. Straub and Kachelski, Atta

State v. Moore, 492 N.W.2d 190 (WI Ct. App. 1992) Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District Four August 20, 1992, Released No. 91-1418-CR 1992 Wisc. App. LEXIS 671; 170 Wis. 2d 732; 492 N.W.2d 190 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RONALD K. MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. Judges: Before Eich, C.J., Gartzke, P.J., and Sundby, J. Opinion GARTZKE,

State v. Mendoza, 258 N.W.2d 260 (WI Supreme Court 1977) Supreme Court of Wisconsin June 2, 1977, Argued ; October 4, 1977, Decided No. 75-806-CR 80 Wis. 2d 122; 258 N.W.2d 260; 1977 Wisc. LEXIS 1184 State, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. Mendoza, Appellant and Cross-Respondent Counsel: For the appellant and cross-respondent there were briefs by

State v. Krause, 675 N.W.2d 811 (WI Ct. App. 2004) Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District Three January 27, 2004, Decided ; January 27, 2004, Filed Appeal No. 03-1511-CR 2004 WI App 37; 2004 Wisc. App. LEXIS 59; 269 Wis. 2d 891; 675 N.W.2d 811 State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David Krause, Defendant-Appellant. Judges: Before