COMMONWEALTH v. VANDERPOOL
367 Mass. 743, 328 N.E.2d 833 (1975)
COMMONWEALTH vs. CLIFFORD F. VANDERPOOL, THIRD.
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Hampden.
Argued, March 3, 1975.
Decided, May 14, 1975.
Present: TAURO, C.J., QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, HENNESSEY, & KAPLAN, JJ.
Counsel:
Margaret D. McGaughey for the defendant.
William W. Teahan, Jr., Special Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.
TAURO, C.J.
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and appeals pursuant to G.L.c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. He contends that the trial judge erred (1) in not instructing the jury that they could find the defendant guilty of manslaughter, (2) in refusing to allow the defendant to explain his behavior following an incident at the trial, and (3) in refusing to sequester the witnesses. He also urges that we exercise our powers under § 33E and reduce his conviction to murder in the second degree or manslaughter. Although we find no legal error, we are convinced that justice will best be served by reducing the conviction to murder in the second degree.
The evidence in this case was conflicting. Based on their verdict, it is apparent that the jury believed the prosecution version of the facts. Briefly, the jury could have found that the defendant and other members of a club, the Outcast Renegades, were involved in an altercation with the victim at a bar early in the afternoon after which the defendant spent the remainder of the day visiting other bars with various members of the club. At some point, he heard a rumor that the victim planned to press criminal charges as a result of the earlier fight, and the defendant and one Antonio Torres went looking for him to determine if the rumor were true. Torres had a gun in his possession, the same gun a member of the club, possibly the defendant, told him to get earlier in the day.
The defendant and Torres proceeded to the National Cafe where the victim was watching a card game in the back room. The defendant entered through the rear door, confronted the victim and asked him if the rumor were true. When the victim admitted that he intended to apply for a warrant for the defendant’s arrest, the defendant responded, “[W]e’ll get you,” and punched the victim, whereupon two shots were fired, one of them killing the victim.
It is undisputed that Torres actually fired the shots. Torres testified that he was drunk and high on “acid” and did the shooting at the urging of the defendant, who yelled, “Shoot him, Tony, shoot him, Tony.” None of the eyewitnesses to the shooting testified to hearing the defendant’s alleged statement, but otherwise their testimony essentially corroborated that of Torres.
The defendant’s testimony as to the events on the day of the homicide differed sharply from the testimony of Torres and other witnesses for the prosecution. The defendant claimed that he was no longer a member of the Outcast Renegades and that he was in disfavor with members of the club. He testified that he interceded in the earlier fight between the victim and members of the club in order to act as a peacemaker.
He stated that he went to the National Cafe alone to get one last drink before going home. On his arrival, he observed the victim and approached him regarding the rumor because of his desire to clear up the matter and prevent further trouble. When the victim stated that he planned to press charges and called the defendant by his brother’s name,1 an argument ensued. The defendant and the victim swung at each other, but since both were somewhat intoxicated, neither landed any blows. Suddenly, the defendant heard a shot, imagined himself back in Viet Nam2 and fled. He returned home, where he was later questioned and arrested by police.
1. There was no error in the trial judge’s refusal to charge the jury on manslaughter. While it is true that “[i]n a homicide case, the trial judge should charge on the issue of manslaughter where any view of the evidence will permit a finding that the offence is manslaughter and not murder,” Commonwealth v. LePage, 352 Mass. 403, 419 (1967), it is also well settled that the judge may not charge on a hypothesis not supported by the evidence. Commonwealth v. Campbell, 352 Mass. 387, 392 (1967). Commonwealth v. Costa, 360 Mass. 177, 184 (1971). Commonwealth v. Caine, 366 Mass. 366, 375 (1974).
In deciding whether a manslaughter instruction is supported by the evidence, all reasonable inferences must be resolved in favor of the defendant. “The fact that the evidence may not be of a character to inspire belief does not authorize the refusal of an instruction based thereon…. However incredible the testimony of a defendant may be he is entitled to an instruction based upon the hypothesis that it is entirely true.” Commonwealth v. Campbell, supra, at 398, quoting from People v. Carmen, 36 Cal.2d 768, 773 (1951). In this case, however, even accepting the defendant’s version of the facts, there was no basis for a charge on either voluntary or involuntary manslaughter.
Voluntary manslaughter is “a killing from a sudden transport of passion or heat of blood, upon a reasonable provocation and without malice, or upon sudden combat.” Commonwealth v. Soaris, 275 Mass. 291, 299 (1931). Accord, Commonwealth v. Hartford,346 Mass. 482, 490 (1963); Commonwealth v. Caine,366 Mass. 366, 375 (1974). There is no evidence here from which the jury could have found the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter. The evidence is undisputed that both the defendant and the deceased were somewhat intoxicated. Even if the jury had believed that the parties swung at each other, no blows were ever landed, and the situation could not have objectively met the requirements of “combat,” “passion” or “heat of blood.” See Commonwealth v. Leate,352 Mass. 452, 457-458 (1967). Similarly, the jury could not have found reasonable provocation, as we have often repeated that words alone do not constitute adequate provocation. Commonwealth v. Webster, 5 Cush. 295, 305 (1850). Commonwealth v. Hartford, supra, at 491. Commonwealth v. Leate, supra, at 458. Accordingly, there was no error in the judge’s refusal to charge the jury on voluntary manslaughter.
Involuntary manslaughter is an unlawful homicide unintentionally caused by an act which constitutes such a disregard of probable harmful consequences to another as to amount to wanton or reckless conduct. Commonwealth v. Welansky, 316 Mass. 383, 399 (1944). Commonwealth v. Campbell, 352 Mass. 387, 397 (1967). Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 560 (1969). Commonwealth v. Kinney, 361 Mass. 709, 712 (1972). On the record before us, there is no view of the evidence which would justify a finding of involuntary manslaughter, and there was no error in the trial judge’s refusal to charge otherwise.
2. In the course of the testimony by one Leo Derosiers, a prosecution witness, the defendant became ill and vomited when a loud noise was heard in the court room.3 A recess was called and the defendant was examined by a doctor who found him able to continue with the trial. The defendant asked that the statement of the physician, explaining the defendant’s reaction, be read to the jury but the trial judge refused subject to the defendant’s exception. There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the judge’s failure to allow an explanation of the incident was error.
“A display of emotion in one charged with a crime is not unnatural; it is as consistent with innocence as with guilt.” Commonwealth v. Favulli, 352 Mass. 95, 116 (1967). Thus, it was not an abuse of discretion for the judge to refuse the defendant’s request to explain the incident.
We note, however, that where there is any real danger that, in reaching their verdict, the jury may consider some extraneous factor, and not only the evidence properly presented, it is desirable for the trial judge to give cautionary instructions. See Commonwealth v. Brownell, 145 Mass. 319, 323 (1887); Commonwealth v. Brown,364 Mass. 471, 479-480 (1973); Commonwealth v. Caine,366 Mass. 366, 372 (1974). Cf. Commonwealth v. Mutina,366 Mass. 810 (1975). The content and timing of such instructions are within the judge’s discretion as incident to his control over the conduct of the trial. See Commonwealth v. Coyne, 228 Mass. 269, 270 (1917); Commonwealth v. Fleming,360 Mass. 404, 409 (1971). In the instant case, the judge, in his final charge to the jury, stated, “The case must be decided by you on the evidence presented right here in this courtroom and upon nothing else.” This served as a clear instruction to the jury that they were not to consider the illness of the defendant as it occurred in the court room. There is no indication that the verdict was “otherwise than on the facts and the applicable law.” Commonwealth v. Favulli, supra.
There is no merit to the defendant’s further contention that the incident tended to impeach his credibility and thus entitled him to rehabilitate himself by way of explanation. The cases cited in support of this theory, Commonwealth v. Smith,329 Mass. 477 (1952), Commonwealth v. Fatalo,345 Mass. 85 (1962), and Commonwealth v. Kerrigan,345 Mass. 508 (1963), all involved impeachment on cross-examination and are not relevant to the instant case.
3. There was no error in the refusal by the judge to sequester the witnesses. It is well settled that sequestration of witnesses lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge. Commonwealth v. Blackburn,354 Mass. 200, 205 (1968). Commonwealth v. Therrien,359 Mass. 500, 508 (1971). Commonwealth v. Bettencourt,361 Mass. 515, 518 (1972). Although the better practice in capital cases is to allow such a procedure, we cannot say that failure to do so in this case was an abuse of discretion.
4. We have determined that there was no error in the conduct of the trial. Nevertheless, we have the further duty under G.L.c. 278, § 33E, to consider the whole case broadly to determine whether justice requires a change in the verdict. Commonwealth v. Jones,366 Mass. 805, 806-807 (1975), citing Commonwealth v. Williams,364 Mass. 145, 150 (1973). “If upon our examination of the facts, we should, in our discretion, be of opinion that there was a miscarriage of justice in convicting the defendant of murder in the first degree, and that a verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree or of manslaughter would have been more consonant with justice, it is now our power and duty so to declare.” Commonwealth v. Williams, supra, quoting from Commonwealth v. Baker,346 Mass. 107, 109 (1963). We are fully aware that our powers under § 33E are to be used with restraint. Commonwealth v. Lannon,364 Mass. 480, 486 (1974).
“In Commonwealth v. Williams, 364 Mass. 145 (1973), we held that, although the jury were warranted in their verdict, the thrust of the evidence required a reduction of a verdict of murder in the first degree to murder in the second degree to avoid a miscarriage of justice.” Commonwealth v. Jones, supra, at 808. In the instant case, while we think that the evidence may have been sufficient to warrant a verdict of murder in the first degree, we believe that on the weight of the evidence it would be more consonant with justice to reduce the verdict to murder in the second degree.
The facts reveal that all those involved in the homicide were under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In approaching the victim, the defendant’s apparent intention was to settle a conflict, not to intensify it. There is no indication that the defendant left the first altercation with the idea of revenge and thereafter proceeded to carry out his plan. On the contrary, the undisputed evidence indicates that the defendant, prior to the killing, had the intention of merely explaining his position and reconciling his difficulties with the victim. The matter was further complicated by the victim’s apparent confusion of the defendant’s name with that of his brother. In this aspect, this case is distinguishable from those cases where we have declined to reduce a verdict, Commonwealth v. Pratt,360 Mass. 708, 715 (1972); Commonwealth v. Nordstrom,364 Mass. 310, 311-312 (1973), for in each of those cases, “there appears to have been a period of reflection and premeditation after the original difficulties between the parties and before the ultimate homicide.” Commonwealth v. Stillwell,366 Mass. 1, 6 (1974).4 We can find no such period of reflection or premeditation in this case. In all the circumstances the killing here may be described as “senseless.” Commonwealth v. Jones, supra, at 808.
In addition to the evidence discussed above, the following facts, although not decisive, have received our consideration. The defendant did not fire the fatal shot, the shooting having been done by Torres, who was the crucial witness against the defendant. Torres had not been tried or sentenced for his role in the homicide at the time of the defendant’s trial. He was thereafter allowed to plead guilty to murder in the second degree. Additionally, the defendant, who testified in his own behalf, was twenty-two years old, married with two small children, and suffered from disabling injuries as a result of his service in the Viet Nam war. “There was no evidence introduced of any prior criminality on the part of the defendant…. G.L.c. 233, § 21. We assume there was none.” Commonwealth v. Jones, supra, at 808.
To conclude, we believe that the defendant’s “criminal involvement was not of the nature that judges and juries, in weighing evidence, ordinarily equate with murder in the first degree.” Commonwealth v. Williams, 364 Mass. at 152.
5. The case is remanded to the Superior Court where the verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree and the sentence previously imposed are to be vacated. A verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree shall be entered and sentence imposed thereon.
So ordered.
Footnotes
1. In the course of this confrontation, the victim addressed the defendant as Chuck. When the defendant told the victim that Chuck was his brother and that he was Cliff, the victim responded by calling the defendant a liar.
2. The defendant testified regarding his military service during the Viet Nam war. He had been wounded on two occasions and was hospitalized and treated for shell shock. He reacted to loud noises and had to give up two jobs after his military discharge because of his reactions to noises at work.
3. It is unclear from the record how much of this incident occurred in the presence of the jury.
4. Commonwealth v. Deeran, 364 Mass. 193 (1973), and Commonwealth v. Rooney, 365 Mass. 484 (1974), also cited in Stillwell as examples of cases where we refused to reduce a verdict, were both convictions of murder in the second degree. In those cases, it is apparent that the jury did not find the reflection and premeditation necessary for a conviction of murder in the first degree, and there was no occasion for this court to take the action we take here.
Pingback: URL
Pingback: Real estate Agent in Suffolk VA - Home Sales
Pingback: Harold Jahn Alberta
Pingback: Tyson vs Jones jr live stream online
Pingback: dumps biz
Pingback: new-solarmovie.com
Pingback: credit card dumps track 2
Pingback: http://144.91.94.11/pasarqq/
Pingback: buy new driving license i\'ll
Pingback: ruger in stock
Pingback: Cornhole Shop
Pingback: ตู้แปลภาษา
Pingback: ดูการ์ตูนออนไลน์
Pingback: mơ thấy đánh nhau chết người
Pingback: mơ bị sét đánh
Pingback: con bò cạp số mấy
Pingback: Bilskrotning Göteborg
Pingback: mơ thấy mua nhà
Pingback: cvv shop ru
Pingback: pet calm
Pingback: incredit
Pingback: pasar qq
Pingback: fx signals
Pingback: great dumps
Pingback: judi online
Pingback: web hosting reviews
Pingback: cvv2 shop
Pingback: mơ thấy đi chợ
Pingback: mơ thấy đá bóng đánh con gì
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy phật bà quan âm
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy mình thắp hương
Pingback: mơ thấy chim bồ câu đánh con gì
Pingback: mơ thấy con sâu
Pingback: mơ cãi nhau đánh con gì
Pingback: cloneswatches.com
Pingback: mơ cá trê đánh con gì
Pingback: mơ thấy thầy bói
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy ngựa đánh số gì
Pingback: mơ cá sấu đánh con gì
Pingback: fakerolex.ru
Pingback: mơ thấy cầu vồng
Pingback: mơ thấy bếp lửa cháy
Pingback: mơ thấy sếp cũ
Pingback: mơ thấy con trâu đánh đề con gì
Pingback: anonymous file upload
Pingback: nằm mơ thấy hôn môi
Pingback: casino
Pingback: http://95.111.232.179/
Pingback: 섹스조아
Pingback: replica rolex
Pingback: hqcbuvav
Pingback: what happens when you take two viagra
Pingback: viagra voor vrouwen waar te koop
Pingback: when to take vitamins when taking azithromycin
Pingback: cialis
Pingback: buy viagra
Pingback: comprar viagra on line
Pingback: english essay writing service
Pingback: idea to write my research paper about
Pingback: write my essay discount code
Pingback: help me write an essay for me
Pingback: how to get amoxicillin without prescription
Pingback: furosemide brand name
Pingback: generic zithromax buy online
Pingback: ivermectin lotion cost
Pingback: albuterol from canada no prescription
Pingback: doxycycline strep coverage
Pingback: prednisolone drug information
Pingback: clomid and opk
Pingback: priligy tablet
Pingback: diflucan el salvador
Pingback: wellbutrin and synthroid
Pingback: propecia breasts
Pingback: neurontin contraindications
Pingback: metformin risks
Pingback: paxil ptsd
Pingback: plaquenil price increase
Pingback: buy cialis tadalafil uk
Pingback: order original cialis online
Pingback: buy cialis now
Pingback: ordering online australia
Pingback: cash advance payday loan biloxi
Pingback: online cash advance stockton
Pingback: can you order retin a
Pingback: canadian retina a no prescription
Pingback: payday loan yes fairfield
Pingback: tinder serial killer
Pingback: cash advance usa cranston
Pingback: soft tablet
Pingback: price of viagra
Pingback: soft tablet
Pingback: lovoo wie lange ist man neu
Pingback: buy ativan 2mg online
Pingback: free online dating cardiff
Pingback: how many mg of cialis should i take
Pingback: typical cialis dose
Pingback: free to message dating sites uk
Pingback: truly free adult dating sites
Pingback: canadian pharmacy propecia
Pingback: pharmacy technician job in canada
Pingback: cialis for pulmonary hypertension
Pingback: generic cialis in texas
Pingback: canadian prescription drugstore
Pingback: cialis patent expiration 2016
Pingback: tadalafil cialis
Pingback: canadian viagra pharmacy
Pingback: generic cialis coupon
Pingback: cost of viagra
Pingback: cialis price increase
Pingback: substitute for viagra
Pingback: tadalafil 20mg cost
Pingback: women viagra
Pingback: cialis before and after photos
Pingback: viagra warnings
Pingback: canada drugs is closing after 17 years
Pingback: free live pharmacy tech ce online
Pingback: viagra history
Pingback: buy cialis online
Pingback: buy viagra online cheapest
Pingback: best drugstore eyeshadow
Pingback: generic for amlodipine
Pingback: difference between pravastatin and atorvastatin
Pingback: can you take prilosec and vitamins at the same time
Pingback: fluoxetine and acetaminophen
Pingback: what does zoloft feel like
Pingback: coming off quetiapine 25mg
Pingback: is lexapro a maoi
Pingback: lyrica drug test
Pingback: cymbalta classification
Pingback: what is hydrochlorothiazide taken for
Pingback: atorvastatin itching
Pingback: how long does it take for lexapro to work for anxiety
Pingback: duloxetine avg dose
Pingback: 1
Pingback: amoxicillin for sale
Pingback: buy cheap finasteride
Pingback: prednisone 250 mg
Pingback: canadian cialis
Pingback: ivermectin 3 mg tab
Pingback: ivermectin pill
Pingback: tadalafil 100
Pingback: stromectol 800 mg
Pingback: ivermectin studies
Pingback: ivermectin lotion over the counter
Pingback: ivermectin river blindness
Pingback: zithramax patient reviews
Pingback: ivermectin for covid
Pingback: ventolin rotahaler
Pingback: equine ivermectin
Pingback: ivermectin for pinworms in humans
Pingback: ivermectin merck
Pingback: how to purchase zithromax online
Pingback: can i take lisinopril with metformin
Pingback: dapoxetine priligy premature ejaculation
Pingback: azithromycin similar drugs over the counter
Pingback: azithromycin otc
Pingback: cost of amoxicillin
Pingback: lasix furosemide
Pingback: gabapentin 1000
Pingback: plaquenil malaria
Pingback: prednisone 50mg cost
Pingback: where to buy priligy
Pingback: provigil for sale
Pingback: ivermectin 8000 mcg
Pingback: albuterol 0.42
Pingback: azithromycin tablets
Pingback: quineprox 80 mg
Pingback: deltasone
Pingback: cialis results
Pingback: buy modafinil us
Pingback: cheapest cialis 40mg
Pingback: online viagra reviews
Pingback: stromectol over the counter
Pingback: cialis 5 mg
Pingback: zithromax 250 mg cost
Pingback: sildenafil walmart
Pingback: cialis for sale
Pingback: viagra pills
Pingback: side effects of cialis daily
Pingback: generic of viagra
Pingback: buy viagra online amazon
Pingback: cialis ® for daily use
Pingback: viagra pill price
Pingback: meloxicam 15 mg uso
Pingback: exclcialisite.com
Pingback: generic ivermectin for humans
Pingback: lumigan 0.03
Pingback: aralen 50mg
Pingback: cost of molnupiravir
Pingback: 8mg zanaflex
Pingback: buying nolvadex
Pingback: Anonymous
Pingback: is latisse safe
Pingback: sildenafil dosing for pulmonary hypertension
Pingback: Anonymous
Pingback: Anonymous
Pingback: ivermectin tablets for humans
Pingback: cost of ivermectin
Pingback: buy stromectol
Pingback: ignition casino login
Pingback: ivermectin tablets for humans
Pingback: ivermectin cost
Pingback: cialis cheapest online prices
Pingback: tadalafil price walmart
Pingback: ivermectin 1% cream generic
Pingback: ivermectin rx
Pingback: order cheap viagra online uk
Pingback: cialis usa
Pingback: how to get generic viagra online
Pingback: where to get ivermectin
Pingback: buy generic cialis online
Pingback: tadalafil citrate liquid
Pingback: sildenafil pills prescription
Pingback: buy cialis
Pingback: cialis cost
Pingback: cialis by mail
Pingback: ivermectin 0.5 lotion india
Pingback: sildenafil pills prescription
Pingback: generic sildenafil pills
Pingback: cheap cialis india
Pingback: cialis online prescription usa
Pingback: cialis dose
Pingback: prednisone 20mg good
Pingback: buying prednisone online uk
Pingback: can you buy cialis in canada
Pingback: online tadalafil prescription
Pingback: molnupiravir fda
Pingback: cialis prescription prices
Pingback: generic cialis pills on line
Pingback: cialis price
Pingback: ivermectin lice oral
Pingback: side effects prednisone
Pingback: cialis tablets
Pingback: buy viagra discount
Pingback: online casino no deposit required
Pingback: cheap cialis india
Pingback: amazon ivermectina para humanos
Pingback: stromectol 5 mg
Pingback: ivermectin gold
Pingback: online casino play for real money
Pingback: le cialis
Pingback: how can i get cheap cialis
Pingback: ndc augmentin
Pingback: generic viagra soft pills
Pingback: generic cialis
Pingback: keflex online
Pingback: medication keflex
Pingback: azithromycin streptococcus
Pingback: ivermectin in humans
Pingback: where can i buy cialis without a prescription
Pingback: cialis prescription australia
Pingback: ivermectin in india
Pingback: where to buy ivermectin cream
Pingback: cephalexin disposal
Pingback: cialis 20mg online
Pingback: order ivermectin for humans
Pingback: purchase azithromycin
Pingback: azithromycin alcohol
Pingback: antibiotic augmentin
Pingback: azithromycin 250mg
Pingback: zithromax ototoxic
Pingback: celecoxib manufacturer coupon
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: trcasino
Pingback: ielexusbet
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: eurocasino
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: meritroyalbet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: fuck google
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: bahis siteleri
Pingback: 3foundation
Pingback: viagra
Pingback: revatio
Pingback: A片
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: sex
Pingback: sex
Pingback: fuvk google
Pingback: fuck google
Pingback: madridbet
Pingback: porn
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: fuck google
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: meritking
Pingback: izmir escort
Pingback: fuck google
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: bağcılar escort
Pingback: porn
Pingback: sex
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: çeşme transfer
Pingback: porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: china mulberry leaf powder making machine manufacturers
Pingback: hd porno izle
Pingback: izmir travesti
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: sikiş
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: yasam ayavefe
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: casino siteleri
Pingback: Casino Siteleri
Pingback: Grandpashabet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: casino porn
Pingback: cratosroyalbet
Pingback: Bu web sitesi sitemap tarafından oluşturulmuştur.
Pingback: porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: ananızın amı sıkılmadınız mı
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: yasam ayavefet
Pingback: jojobet
Pingback: jojobet twitter
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: animal porn
Pingback: porn
Pingback: spinco
Pingback: samsung taşınabilir ssd
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: bmw
Pingback: kadinlar
Pingback: fuck google
Pingback: istanbul travesti
Pingback: ankara travesti
Pingback: edebiyat tumblr
Pingback: ankaratravesti.xyz
Pingback: cocuk porno
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: ankara travesti ilanları
Pingback: sultangazi rent a car
Pingback: gebze epoksi zemin kaplama
Pingback: istanbul dental teknik servis
Pingback: rize tumblr
Pingback: sex
Pingback: prague erotic massage
Pingback: prague tantra massage
Pingback: inovapin.com
Pingback: gaziantep saat tamiri
Pingback: Konya SEO Uzmanı
Pingback: Konya SEO Uzmanı
Pingback: Konya Evden Eve Nakliyat
Pingback: Konya Evden Eve Nakliyat
Pingback: find location by phone number
Pingback: Buy followers instagram
Pingback: web tasarım fiyatları
Pingback: kütahya günlük apart daire
Pingback: takipçi satın al tumblr
Pingback: kütahya günlük apart
Pingback: football skills
Pingback: cristiano ronaldo skills
Pingback: ankara psikolog
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: geciktirici kremler
Pingback: yapay kızlık zarı
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: meritking giriş
Pingback: meritking gir
Pingback: meritking news
Pingback: çorlu klima servisi
Pingback: meritking şikayetvar
Pingback: silivri avukat
Pingback: karşıyaka psikolog
Pingback: hp servis izmir
Pingback: child porn kingroyal
Pingback: fuck
Pingback: child porn
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: spam
Pingback: grandpashabet
Pingback: tr güncel içerik listesi
Pingback: en iyi bayan azdırıcı hangisi
Pingback: canlı maç izle
Pingback: kayseri taksi
Pingback: pusulabet
Pingback: misty casino