People get into the craziest situations–like charging with a gun at a group of punks shooting July 5 (not a typo) fireworks at your apartment building.
According to this brief news report, the now defendant actually shot and wounded someone (who, of course, claims that it was her friends, not her, who was shooting the fireworks, she was minding her own business, didn’t do nothing, etc.). As a result, he’s coming to trial in January on a charge of criminal discharge of a firearm.
He is, of course, claiming self-defense as justification of his use of force.
Could it have been a justified shooting? We don’t have enough facts to make an analysis from the brief news story, but we sure know what the analytic framework must be: Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, and Reasonableness.
(Note: The featured image is a stock photo, not evidence from this case. But that pictured Roman Candle would be no joke if aimed at someone.)
UPDATE: It seems that the defendant in this case had filed a motion for self-defense immunity under Kansas law in an effort to avoid criminal prosecution. Yesterday the trial judge rejected that motion for immunity, and the defendant now proceeds on to trial. (Naturally, the news report mistakenly labels this immunity motion as “stand-your-ground,” but that’s hardly a surprise.)
Attorney Andrew F. Branca Law of Self Defense LLC
IMPORTANT: The LAST DAY for taking advantage of the LOSD CHRISTMAS EXTRAVAGANZA sale and still be sure to receive the goods by Christmas is DECEMBER 14! The EXTRAVAGANZA offers UP TO 60% off our most popular books, DVDs and online courses, and THEY MAKE GREAT GIFTS! CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS!