Case Laws

Swearingden v. State, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6971 (FL Ct. App. 2015) JOHN SWEARINGDEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. CASE NO. 1D14-146 COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6971 May 12, 2015, Opinion Filed COUNSEL: Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Courtenay H. Miller, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for […]

People v. Gonzalez, 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3320 (CA Ct. App. 2015) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GABRIEL GONZALEZ et al., Defendants and Appellants. B252881 COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3320 May 11, 2015, Opinion Filed COUNSEL: Edward H. Schulman, under appointment by the

People v. Aragon, 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3404 (CA Ct. App. 2015) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY ARAGON, Defendant and Appellant. G049673 COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3404 May 15, 2015, Opinion Filed COUNSEL: Jeannie G. Strong, under appointment by the

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (US Supreme Court 1968) Argued: December 12, 1967 Decided: June 10, 1968 Opinion WARREN, C.J., Opinion of the Court MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents serious questions concerning the role of the Fourth Amendment in the confrontation on the street between the

Womack v. State, 253 P. 1027 (OK Ct. App. 1926) ELMER WOMACK v. STATE. No. A-5797. COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA 1926 OK CR 376; 36 Okla. Crim. 44; 253 P. 1027; 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 267 October 30, 1926, Opinion Filed COUNSEL: D. B. Madden and Walter Hubbell, for plaintiff in error.

Kress v. State, 144 S.W.2d 735 (TN Supreme Court 1940) KRESS v. STATE. [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL] SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE 176 Tenn. 478; 144 S.W.2d 735; 1940 Tenn. LEXIS 90 September, 1940, Decided October 19, 1940, Opinion Filed COUNSEL: J. ARTHUR ATCHLEY and REUBEN H. NICHOLS, both of Knoxville, for plaintiff in error.

Roark v. Commonwealth, 28 S.E.2d 693 (VA Supreme Court 1944) AKERS ROARK v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Record No. 2767 Supreme Court of Virginia 182 Va. 244; 28 S.E.2d 693; 1944 Va. LEXIS 174 January 24, 1944 COUNSEL: T. L. Hutton and H. E. Widener, for the plaintiff in error. Abram P. Staples, Attorney General, and

Young v. People, 107 P. 274 (CO Supreme Court 1910) YOUNG v. THE PEOPLE. No. 6377. Supreme Court of Colorado 47 Colo. 352; 107 P. 274; 1910 Colo. LEXIS 206 January, 1910 [January Term] COUNSEL: Mr. T. J. BLACK, and Mr. H. M. HOGG, for plaintiff in error. Hon. WM. H. DICKSON, attorney general, Mr.

People v. Cushinberry, 855 P.2d 18 (CO Ct. App. 1992) The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul L. Cushinberry, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91CA0300 COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE 855 P.2d 18; 1992 Colo. App. LEXIS 468; 17 BTR 12 December 31, 1992, Decided COUNSEL: Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, Raymond T.

Bush v. People, 16 P. 290 (CO Supreme Court 1887) BUSH v. THE PEOPLE. Supreme Court of Colorado 10 Colo. 566; 16 P. 290; 1887 Colo. LEXIS 266 December, 1887 [December Term] COUNSEL: Messrs. WELLS, MACON and McNEAL, for plaintiff in error. ALVIN MARSH, Attorney-General, for defendants in error. JUDGES: Before ELBERT, J. HELM, J.,