Jury Instructions

PA 9.503 JUSTIFICATION: DEFENSE OF PROPERTY (CASTLE DOCTRINE)

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.503 – JUSTIFICATION: DEFENSE OF PROPERTY (CASTLE DOCTRINE) (Effective for cases arising subsequent to August 27, 2011) IN GENERAL 1. The defendant has raised the issue of whether [he] [she] acted to lawfully protect […]

PA 9.503 JUSTIFICATION: DEFENSE OF PROPERTY (CASTLE DOCTRINE) Read More »

PA 9.502B JUSTIFICATION: USE OF NON-DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS (CASTLE DOCTRINE)

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.502B – JUSTIFICATION: USE OF NON-DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS (CASTLE DOCTRINE) (Effective for cases arising subsequent to August 27, 2011) 1. The evidence in this case presents the question of whether the

PA 9.502B JUSTIFICATION: USE OF NON-DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS (CASTLE DOCTRINE) Read More »

PA 9.502A JUSTIFICATION: USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS (CASTLE DOCTRINE)

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.502A – JUSTIFICATION: USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS (CASTLE DOCTRINE) (Effective for cases arising subsequent to August 27, 2011) 1. The evidence in this case presents the question of whether the

PA 9.502A JUSTIFICATION: USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS (CASTLE DOCTRINE) Read More »

PA 9.502 JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.502 – JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS IN GENERAL 1. The defendant has raised the issue of whether [he] [she] acted in defense of another when [he] [she] [describe defendant’s

PA 9.502 JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS Read More »

PA 9.501B JUSTIFICATION: USE OF NON-DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE (CASTLE DOCTRINE)

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.501B – JUSTIFICATION: USE OF NON-DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE (CASTLE DOCTRINE) (Effective for cases arising subsequent to August 27, 2011) 1. The evidence in this case presents the question of whether the defendant acted

PA 9.501B JUSTIFICATION: USE OF NON-DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE (CASTLE DOCTRINE) Read More »

PA 9.501A JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE (CASTLE DOCTRINE)

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.501A – JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE (CASTLE DOCTRINE) (Effective for cases arising subsequent to August 27, 2011) 1. The evidence in this case presents the question of whether the defendant acted

PA 9.501A JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE (CASTLE DOCTRINE) Read More »

PA 9.501 JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART TWO– INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE CRIMES CODE* CHAPTER IX– JUSTIFICATION 9.501 – JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE IN GENERAL 1. The defendant has raised the issue of whether [he] [she] acted in self-defense when [he] [she] [description of defendant’s conduct]. Self-defense is

PA 9.501 JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE Read More »

PA 7.01 PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE—BURDEN OF PROOF—REASONABLE DOUBT

Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions SUGGESTED STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS PART ONE– GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS CHAPTER VII– CONCLUDING AND POST-TRIAL INSTRUCTIONS 7.01 – PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE–BURDEN OF PROOF–REASONABLE DOUBT [First Alternative] 1. A fundamental principle of our system of criminal law is that the defendant is presumed to be innocent. The mere fact that [he]

PA 7.01 PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE—BURDEN OF PROOF—REASONABLE DOUBT Read More »

OR UCrJI No. 1009. INNOCENCE OF DEFENDANT—PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

Oregon Uniform Criminal Jury Instructions GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS No. 1009 – Innocence of Defendant–Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt The defendant is innocent unless and until the defendant is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden is on the state, and the state alone, to prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Reasonable

OR UCrJI No. 1009. INNOCENCE OF DEFENDANT—PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT Read More »

FL FSJI-Civil 405.4 CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE

Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases SECTION 405— DEFAMATION 405.4 CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE [“Clear and convincing evidence” differs from the “greater weight of the evidence” in that it is more compelling and persuasive.] “Clear and convincing evidence” is evidence that is precise, explicit, lacking in confusion, and of such weight that it produces

FL FSJI-Civil 405.4 CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE Read More »