Can a “colorful” past damage a claim of self defense?

By / February 23, 2019

I came across a recent Indiana Court of Appeals case that does a good job of explaining what kinds of prior bad acts can be brought up in court to impugn someone’s claims of self defense. Anyone who has led a pure-as-snow life needn’t worry about such issues, I suppose, but if you’ve lived a more, well, colorful past, it might be useful to know whether a jury is likely to hear about that past …

Can a “colorful” past damage a claim of self defense? Read More »

This post is only available to members. To sign up for free click here.

Anything you DON’T say can be used against you . . . ?

By / February 23, 2019

We’re all familiar with the portion of the Miranda warnings, given upon arrest, that states: “Anything you say or do may be used against you in a court of law.” But what about anything you DON’T say during the arrest, can THAT be used against you in a court of law, particular in the context of self defense? Doesn’t your right to remain silent mean that you can keep silent without any negative legal consequences? …

Anything you DON’T say can be used against you . . . ? Read More »

This post is only available to members. To sign up for free click here.

Attacker’s Reputation for Violence

By / February 23, 2019

A recent court of appeals case from Florida nicely illustrates the legal rationales by which an armed citizen claiming self defense can get evidence of his attacker’s reputation for violence in front of the jury. A clear understanding of these rationales is essential, because they each have very different conditions, and the failure to meet these conditions can result in the jury never hearing of the attacker’s violent reputations–and such evidence could obviously prove decisive …

Attacker’s Reputation for Violence Read More »

This post is only available to members. To sign up for free click here.

Falling Outside the Castle Doctrine

By / February 23, 2019

The boundaries of the castle doctrine and make-my-day legislation came under scrutiny in a Mississippi appellate case this past summer. The defendant, Banton, had shot and killed a man with whom his father was fighting on the family’s front lawn. Banton’s defense relied in part on Mississippi’s Castle Doctrine statute, which purports to provide that there is a legal presumption of a reasonable fear of death or grave bodily harm under circumstances where there is …

Falling Outside the Castle Doctrine Read More »

This post is only available to members. To sign up for free click here.

Can Living in a Bad Neighborhood Justify Self-Defense?

By / February 23, 2019

A recent appeals court case in Florida explored whether the dangerousness of a neighborhood could be used to help justify the decision to use lethal force to in self defense. The defendant, Dowe, had shot and killed a man outside his home, and believed that the jury would be more sympathetic to his self defense claim if they knew how dangerous his neighborhood was. The judge declined to allow such evidence to be presented to …

Can Living in a Bad Neighborhood Justify Self-Defense? Read More »

This post is only available to members. To sign up for free click here.